Evidence for God from Science

http://www.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOLITICS/01/ ... index.html

The dude is really starting to annoy me. I can't help but laugh out loud at his latest attempt.

Tell me about it...this guy really annoyed me when he first tried and he's going back.

"hath the fool said there is no God" -psalms

What a perfect example!

Does he annoy you because he's in the wrong, or is it just because he's calling for rejection of something Christian? Something tells me it's the latter.

Would posting a link to a web site that contains offensive language(swearing in other words) be considered against the rules of this site? Because there is an article from an unbiased source that makes a great job of explaining why Newdow sucks.

I don't particularly check links as much as I examine posts, but unless the content on the linked page is extreme, I would personally allow it.

Kurieuo.

Since you're on, feel free to delete my post if it's too extreme. I'm used to this kind of language (went to a rather "bad" high school) so I wouldn't know.

http://maddox.xmission.com/pledge.html

Just an extra bit of clarification, MM: we obviously can't check every single link (most are articles that are philosophical, theological, or scientific in nature, so usually it isn't necessary to check for "appropriateness."), so, as K noted, feel free to use your own judgement. But, if something is over the top, K or myself will remove it and let you know. I would also encourage you to note with the link that it contains material some might be uncomfortable with, and the nature of that material as well. That way, even if it isn't over the line, but at the same time steps on someone's "pet peeve," they know to avoid it or at least they would have been warned.

Will do.