Evidence for God from Science

is it true that most of the known scientist now a days dot believe in god or afterlife? and if someone can provide a list with scientist who believe in god and afterlife not only christians but from any other religions? this is somewhat important question for me.
thank you.

There is a thread here under God and Science titled Christian and Christian Organizations in Science.

There is also a link in the first post in this thread by Canuckster that may interest you.

I Hope this helps.

btw-Welcome to the board Joe Joe 900 !

This might answer your question... I don't know if these scientists are religious, but they challenge DE.

"Various tenets of Darwinian evolution, and the evidence put forth to support it, has been scientifically challenged by doctoral scientists, researchers and theorists at a number of universities, colleges, and research institutes around the world. Over 700 scientists have signed the Scientific Dissent from Darwin statement since it originated in 2001."

http://www.discovery.org/v/16

Gman wrote:This might answer your question... I don't know if these scientists are religious, but they challenge DE.

"Various tenets of Darwinian evolution, and the evidence put forth to support it, has been scientifically challenged by doctoral scientists, researchers and theorists at a number of universities, colleges, and research institutes around the world. Over 700 scientists have signed the Scientific Dissent from Darwin statement since it originated in 2001."

http://www.discovery.org/v/16

hmm are you sure those are even biologists? Because it wouldn't make sense if they were geologists or something, and DI was just looking for anyone with PhD. in front of their name.

Markster106 wrote: hmm are you sure those are even biologists? Because it wouldn't make sense if they were geologists or something, and DI was just looking for anyone with PhD. in front of their name.

I don't know, maybe you could ask one of them. One of them is a member of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences.

http://www.discovery.org/articleFiles/P ... istsAd.pdf

seems like only about half of those are biologists.

http://www.csicop.org/intelligentdesign ... teves.html

Markster106 wrote:seems like only about half of those are biologists.

http://www.csicop.org/intelligentdesign ... teves.html

Well there is a beginning for everything... Darwin wasn't exactly a scientist either. He was a theologian. Although interested in biological science, he received his theology degree from Cambridge in 1831.. In fact hardly any of the founding fathers of evolution had a degree in science.

Gman wrote:

Markster106 wrote:seems like only about half of those are biologists.

http://www.csicop.org/intelligentdesign ... teves.html

Well there is a beginning for everything... Darwin wasn't exactly a scientist either. He was a theologian. Although interested in biological science, he received his theology degree from Cambridge in 1831.. In fact hardly any of the founding fathers of evolution had a degree in science.

Still, Darwin went around the world for five years studying evolution and recording his observations, eventually writing an entire book. Could you say the same about the those scientists?

Markster106 wrote:Still, Darwin went around the world for five years studying evolution and recording his observations, eventually writing an entire book.

So your argument is that if someone travels around the world for five years, records his observations, and then writes a book about it that somehow puts his ideas above everyone else?

Markster106 wrote:Could you say the same about the those scientists?

I don't know, could you?

So your argument is that if someone travels around the world for five years, records his observations, and then writes a book about it that somehow puts his ideas above everyone else?

if you went around the world and stumbled on something as monumental as Darwin and presented it in Darwin's fashion, someone else could easily revolutionize science. That's the dream of all scientists I hope

Himantolophus wrote:

So your argument is that if someone travels around the world for five years, records his observations, and then writes a book about it that somehow puts his ideas above everyone else?

if you went around the world and stumbled on something as monumental as Darwin and presented it in Darwin's fashion, someone else could easily revolutionize science. That's the dream of all scientists I hope

As long as God gets the glory... That's all I'm concerned about.