Page 1 of 1

God, Old Testament vs. New Testament

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:26 am
by Adam_777
Hi Everyone,

I'm new here and I would like some help. When I discuss things with Atheists one of the topics that I find coming up the most has to do with the commands of God to stone offenders for various offenses or the commanded ruination of neighboring nations. They perceive that if we were "really" following scripture we would follow these commands or they try to label God as "evil" for commanding the Jews to carry out such acts in the OT. One last approach is the claim that this is an "obvious" sign that the God of the Bible was made up to control people and justify conquest similar to the other gods of pagan civilizations.

I understand that we are under the Law of Grace now and Jesus' fulfillment of the Law of Moses has drastically changed how we relate with God and how we relate with each other. I find it rather difficult to communicate the change.

I actively seek seminars and understandings of scholars. I find people like William Lane Craig, Alistair McGrath, and Ravi Zacharias as some of the most helpful apologists today. I haven't found any material from them that goes into great detail regarding this subject.

Oddly enough I have found the best relief on this topic from a rather obscure TV "word of faith" evangelist named Andrew Wommack (He has an intuitive series called “The True Nature of God”). However, I'm seeking help on this topic specifically from an apologist who is also a scholar.

As a Christian, I use the person of Jesus Christ as the pivot point of my faith and understanding. Atheists find this unacceptable and insist that we “justify” God without the pronouncements and understanding that are brought forth in the NT. I know this is unacceptable but I want to learn what the answers are to this type of questioning. I know most of the common Biblical reasoning. I'm just hoping someone can guide me to more in depth information.

I know I just came in here with both guns blazing. :guns: Thanks, in advance, for the responses. y*-:)

Re: God, Old Testament vs. New Testament

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:48 am
by cslewislover
I'm not a "scholar", I guess, since my degrees aren't in the bible, but I like apologetics and have some resources. Hopefully others will answer you too (oh, and welcome to the board!). I guess I'll try and summarize an article I have called "Why Does God Seem So Angry in the OT & Loving in the New?" But I can say first off that God was establishing His nation amongst other cultures, and the law and its punishments were to be an example. That's kind-of obvious. Also, Israel was a nation and they carried out God's laws. That's hard for a lot of people to understand today since we don't live in theocracies. The only ones there are today seem to be very repressive. Anyway, I actually don't think these reasons will make any difference to a lot of people - our culture is just very open and permissive, and punishing someone for something that God says is a sin (that doesn't involve violence) is just mind-boggling to them. Anyway, I'm going to get to that article . . . if I find any sites that offer you good info on it, I'll post that too.

PS. It might be interesting to pose your questions to David Hocking. He's a messianic jew who is a speaker and writer. He might actually answer you. http://www.davidhocking.org/

Re: God, Old Testament vs. New Testament

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:55 am
by Adam_777
Hi cslewislover,

Thanks for the link.

Re: God, Old Testament vs. New Testament

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 9:36 am
by cslewislover
Adam_777 wrote:Hi cslewislover,

Thanks for the link.
You're welcome!

"Why Does God Seem So Angry in the Old Testament & Loving in the New?"
in Hard Sayings of the Bible (Kaiser, Davids, Bruce, Brauch; InterVarsity Press 1996, 43-47)

1) People get the impression that God is wrathful in the OT, but loving in the NT.
2) But there is no difference. The NT makes it clear that seeing Jesus is the same as seeing The Father. The NT writers were jews and knew of God's character, and they believe Jesus exhibits it.
3) Three main points: a) There is love in the OT; b) there is judgment in the NT; c) "the main difference is a difference between judgment within history and judgment at the end of history."
4) RE point a. God presents his love a lot in the OT. In Exodus 34:6-7 he describes himself as loving. He chose Isreal out of love and tries to keep her because of his love. He loves other peoples too (see Jonah). See also Hosea. God is very forgiving, taking much time to let people repent.
5) RE point b. Jesus himself warns of judgment. There are 108 verses with judge or judgment in them in the NT (NIV). Grace is given to those who repent, otherwise judgment will come.
6) RE point c. In the OT, Israel was judged and punished by God at the time, or within a certain amount of time. What the afterlife would be like was only partially revealed - OT people's were concerned more with the here and now, and establishing a lineage. The NT reveals much more of the afterlife, and speaks of the distant future. Judgment will affect our eternities, not just our families.

To me, this doesn't explain everything fully, so I'll see if I can find some more. I think, though, that if people are going to argue about the judgmental God of the OT, they are probably going to argue also about people having to go to hell in the NT.

Re: God, Old Testament vs. New Testament

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 10:42 am
by Adam_777
cslewislover wrote:To me, this doesn't explain everything fully, so I'll see if I can find some more. I think, though, that if people are going to argue about the judgmental God of the OT, they are probably going to argue also about people having to go to hell in the NT.
Hell to me doesn't seem as difficult of an issue. The only aspect of Hell (or more properly the ultimate Lake of Fire, Rev 14:11, Rev 20:15) is the eternal torment that I feel unease about but I trust God to know why the suffering is unquenched and why souls don't get annihilated.

God makes every effort to reconcile His children (2 Peter 3:9). The people who reject God here and are deceived into believing they have good reason to do so will continue to do so even/especially in the outshining glory of God, especially when they can't connect the dots (because of deception) that true freedom is found in subjection to God, their maker.

God has granted us choice as a promise. God doesn't revoke that freewill. People, who choose to reject Him, will march to Hell on their own freewill. They'll convince themselves that they didn't trust Him in the first place and they didn't like the people that are in Heaven either and their life was their own anyway so why should they lay at God's feet. It will be the same thing that's going on here. They'll find personal choice more important than cooperating with the one that gives our life ultimate meaning and ultimate purpose and ultimate joy, Jesus Christ.

I know this is off topic but I thought I'd share. I did send an email to David Hocking. I'll share his response if I get one. Thanks for the additional information. It will behoove me to pray about these things.

Re: God, Old Testament vs. New Testament

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 11:36 am
by cslewislover
That'll be interesting to see if David gives you some good info or references. I've heard/seen him speak many times, and he knows about OT laws. I know the judgment of God overall is different than Israel having nasty punishments like stoning. But I think most people, if they think about it at all, know that laws are laws and punishments are punishments. They changed through time. It's just the way it was then. I'd like to read more about it myself, as I don't remember much; that is, how Israel's laws and punishments were different than the cultures and nations around them. The most recent thing I had read had to do with homosexuality, and how Israel was different in not allowing it, while those around them considered it pretty normal. Anyway, so yes, hopefully David will share some good stuff and you can share it with us.

Re: God, Old Testament vs. New Testament

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:05 pm
by Adam_777
I'll keep you posted. I hope others join this dialogue. I've enjoyed you're insights.

Re: God, Old Testament vs. New Testament

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 1:34 pm
by JC333
I am still only a student. My take on this is from Hebrews 13:8"Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever."

All the attributes of God are just as true in the new testament as they were in the old testament. While the new testament tends to show less evidence of God's wrath, there are still plenty of scriptures in the New Testament that talk about God punishing the sinful because they refuse to repent. Revelations 16 is a good place to check that out... http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?se ... version=50;

Also, this website answers this question with more detail.
http://www.gotquestions.org/God-different.html



By the way this is Matt 8)

Re: God, Old Testament vs. New Testament

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:10 pm
by B. W.
Adam_777 wrote:Hi Everyone, I'm new here and I would like some help. When I discuss things with Atheists one of the topics that I find coming up the most has to do with the commands of God to stone offenders for various offenses or the commanded ruination of neighboring nations. They perceive that if we were "really" following scripture we would follow these commands or they try to label God as "evil" for commanding the Jews to carry out such acts in the OT. One last approach is the claim that this is an "obvious" sign that the God of the Bible was made up to control people and justify conquest similar to the other gods of pagan civilizations.

I understand that we are under the Law of Grace now and Jesus' fulfillment of the Law of Moses has drastically changed how we relate with God and how we relate with each other. I find it rather difficult to communicate the change.

I actively seek seminars and understandings of scholars. I find people like William Lane Craig, Alistair McGrath, and Ravi Zacharias as some of the most helpful apologists today. I haven't found any material from them that goes into great detail regarding this subject.

Oddly enough I have found the best relief on this topic from a rather obscure TV "word of faith" evangelist named Andrew Wommack (He has an intuitive series called “The True Nature of God”). However, I'm seeking help on this topic specifically from an apologist who is also a scholar.

As a Christian, I use the person of Jesus Christ as the pivot point of my faith and understanding. Atheists find this unacceptable and insist that we “justify” God without the pronouncements and understanding that are brought forth in the NT. I know this is unacceptable but I want to learn what the answers are to this type of questioning. I know most of the common Biblical reasoning. I'm just hoping someone can guide me to more in depth information.

I know I just came in here with both guns blazing. :guns: Thanks, in advance, for the responses. y*-:)
When have I discussed this subject with an atheist I point out several things to him or her. First, they are attacking the validity of the bible. I used to use this 'validity' tactic as a former atheist towards Christians, so let me attempt to give a few pointers.

You'll have to be direct and come to terms to use the bible by saying something along these lines: “I see you are attacking the validity of the bible by your comments and since the bible is at question, I must be permitted to use it to answer your question.”

Depending on the person, most will acquiesce readily and others may be a bit more intolerant and boisterously poses objections to using the bible. If that is the case, I would politely remind them that they are being narrow-minded by not allowing the bible to answer their own questions. Are they afraid that the bible may dispel their presuppositious answers?

This may go round and round a bit but stick to presenting your case.

Tip: You must understand the Hebrew concept of name means. It was used to describe the nature and character of the one who is 'so named.' To blaspheme 'the name' means to use ones characteristic against that person to get away with something as well as get what you want. Very similar how a person test's another love's; For example, “I can't be punished for this infraction because to do so would prove that they do not love me, so I'll commit a morally outrages act because God will never punish because he is so loving….”

Next — know your case by gaining insight in who God is - his nature and character as well as how people abuse his name everyday:

When the bible speaks in the OT about stoning and putting to death these were written for the Children of Israel during an ancient time and place. Jesus set us free from the law of sin and death. The reason for this type of severity was to stop those in covenant with God from blaspheming the name of God.

Do not use the word 'blaspheme' instead think of it as taking advantage of God's good character. Staining and misusing God's good and loving character for ones own selfish gain or justifcation is how one blasphemes the name of the Lord. (Tip: The word translated name denotes ones character...)

Look at the following scriptures:

Lev 20:2-3, "Say to the people of Israel, Any one of the people of Israel or of the strangers who sojourn in Israel who gives any of his children to Molech shall surely be put to death. The people of the land shall stone him with stones. 3 I myself will set my face against that man and will cut him off from among his people, because he has given one of his children to Molech, to make my sanctuary unclean and to profane my holy name." ESV

The rites of Molech are basically, taking an infant or child, and placing them in such manner as to burn to death in a roasted meal for Molech to devour. This violates God's life giving nature and thus profanes his Holy Character of a life giving God. Remember, God's gift of life is a gift and he will not violate his gifts.

This practice involved the practice of killing babies, either by forcing out of the womb or even a young age. This practice may have involved cannibalism as well. What do we do with the vilest of serial killers who prey on children and devour them? We put them to death either by force or confine to die according to old age where they can do no harm. Why cannot God?

(Tip: Turn their objections back on them)

Lev 24:11, 16, “...and the Israelite woman's son blasphemed the Name, and cursed. Then they brought him to Moses. His mother's name was Shelomith, the daughter of Dibri, of the tribe of Dan….16 Whoever blasphemes the name of the LORD shall surely be put to death. All the congregation shall stone him. The sojourner as well as the native, when he blasphemes the Name, shall be put to death. " ESV

Again misusing God's love and goodness to continue to sin is how one blasphemes. Or example, Romans 6:1 concept of being “under grace so that we may sin freely' is the theme of this story. Or if a person says, 'I am part of the covenant people and because of this I can do as I please…and get away with doing harm.” That was why they had that sentence upon them.

Point this out to them — “How have we all misused God's grace and mock him everyday by how we live?” point out their own objections to them. Show that they need forgiveness and how imperfect they are. This takes prayer and skill to develop…

Num 15:30, 35, “But the person who does anything with a high hand, whether he is native or a sojourner, reviles the LORD, and that person shall be cut off from among his people. 35 And the LORD said to Moses, "The man shall be put to death; all the congregation shall stone him with stones outside the camp." ESV

Again reviles by misusing God's love and mercy to keep rebellious ways alive…

Everyone is guilty of rebellion and misusing the God who is as the Psalmist describes:

Psalms 145:8-20, “The LORD is gracious and merciful, slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love. 9 The LORD is good to all, and his mercy is over all that he has made….Your kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and your dominion endures throughout all generations. (The LORD is faithful in all his words and kind in all his works.)” ESV

We all abuse his grace and mercy because he is slow to anger. We abuse his steadfast love in doing things that try his love and patience like.... (you fill in the blank here)

Psalms 145:16-20, “You open your hand; you satisfy the desire of every living thing....”

God satisfies the desires of every living and since we are alive, this means if you do not want anything to do with God, he will grant that request, a place without God and without his love or grace.

Psalms 145:20, “The LORD preserves all who love him, but all the wicked he will destroy.”

Basically, pray and seek out ways that people take advantage of God's good nature and make it fit personally to whom you are speaking too.

We are all by human nature, children of wrath who need adopted to become God's children. That is what God desires. He offers this freely. Atheists seem to want a harsh austere God easily manipulated and not one who is just - who will grant them what they want in the end...

Here you can begin to preach the cross of Christ to them and share how Jesus paid the penalty for our abusive and rebellious ways….

At least make them think…
-
-
-

Re: God, Old Testament vs. New Testament

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:36 pm
by Adam_777
Hi B.W.,

Thanks for the reply this is definitely the direction I need.

Re: God, Old Testament vs. New Testament

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:50 pm
by zoegirl
R.C.Sproul explains the differences betweent he Old and New very well. But depending on your doctrine you might not like him....he is definitely reformed theology.


THe Old Testament establishes the laws that REVEAL the need for a savior. All throughout the Old Testament you see the fact that we cannot fulfill the law.

Re: God, Old Testament vs. New Testament

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:50 pm
by Adam_777
zoegirl wrote:R.C.Sproul explains the differences betweent he Old and New very well. But depending on your doctrine you might not like him....he is definitely reformed theology.


THe Old Testament establishes the laws that REVEAL the need for a savior. All throughout the Old Testament you see the fact that we cannot fulfill the law.
I enjoy RC Sproul. I have a motto "Eat the meat spit out the bones." (1 Thess 5:21) I don't find myself offended very easily. I simply seek the truth of God. I worship in a grounded Pentecostal church (Some people here are saying. What's that?) Believe me, there are Charismatic's who are seeking the order and historical faith of God's Word while they witness friends and family go down odd rabbit trails. We are starting to take responsibility for not having answers and not being responsible. I'm glad to be in the place that God planted me. Pray for us.

Please lead me to a link if you have one. I'm certainly open.

Re: God, Old Testament vs. New Testament

Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 7:26 pm
by zoegirl
R.C.Sproul wrote:From the past to the future, the sovereign and gracious God of the universe covenantally promises to redeem us and to bring us and our offspring into a covenantal relationship with Him. He promises not only that He will be our God and the God of our offspring after us, but also that we will be His people both now and forever.
— Back to Basics p. 66

Covenant theology maintains that God has organized redemptive history in terms of covenants and a promise, or, as the apostle Paul declares, “the covenants of promise” (Eph. 2:12). This covenant work, this “marriage bond” from Genesis to Revelation, He unifies by the promise that He is redeeming a people for Himself, a promise most gloriously expressed throughout Scripture by the formula, “I will be your God, and you will be My people.”
— Back to Basics p. 69

Every written document has a structure or format by which it is organized. Paragraphs have subjects and chapters have focal points. Reformed theology sees the primary structure of biblical revelation as that of covenant. This is the structure by which the entire history of redemption is worked out.
— What is Reformed Theology? p. 99

The covenant of redemption involves the parties who work together to effect human redemption: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. This covenant is rooted in eternity. God's plan of redemption was no afterthought, designed to repair a creation run amuck.
— What is Reformed Theology? p. 108

Redemption is always through grace by faith. In the Old Testament faith was directed forward to the promised future Redeemer, while in the New Testament faith is directed backward to the redemptive work of Christ, which has been accomplished in history.
— What is Reformed Theology? p. 114
http://www.ligonier.org/about_founder_on.php