That is a better answered that I thought I was gonna get, I thank you for it.
You're welcome. We do our best here.
But I think that the whole thing revolves around the fact that it sounds as if you think that living doesn't have any merit. Why fall in love, just to fall in love, smile just for the fun of it, why do you need a purpose, be good just because, why the need for a reward when just living and experiencing life it's the reward. That's the thing that bothers me about the whole GOD thing.
Living in and of itself doesn't have any merit. How much time have you spent in grief over the trillions upon trillions of cells that have died in the ages past? What makes human life so special?
You tell me why we should fall in love or smile if there is no purpose. Can you show me a difference in spending your life happy or sad if in the end, it all comes to naught? You may say it bothers you about God, but you must admit that if God exists and eternity is real, then what we do here DOES matter and it DOES have purpose.
Anyway, it seems to me that you are just artificially assigning value to something that has no value in and of itself. In other words, you are being intellectually dishonest. You tell me you don't see a reason to believe in God. I am giving you one. If you think life has value, you have to attribute that to be God to be logical. If you are going to be consistent in your reasoning, you have to admit that life--ALL LIFE--is meaningless if God doesn't exist. ALL OF IT, including that of those you love most. It's all a giant waste of time, assuming, of course, that time had any value so that it could actually be "wasted."
Shy of that admission, it isn't true that you don't see a reason to believe in God. You are just being disingenuous, no matter how polite and nice you may be about it . . .
And about the whole hurting people thing, it matters to each one, it's not like GOD stops bad thing from happening so at the end of the day bad things will happen whether or not GOD is around, but I bet you are going to say that if GOD wasn't around things would be worse right?
Maybe it would and maybe it wouldn't. I don't know. I'm not God. But that's the key, isn't it. In order to answer that question, you would have to know everything. Do you? I don't. Therefore, I cannot say. Are you in possession of some knowledge that I am not that allows you to say what God should or should not have done in any given situation? Are you in possession of ALL the facts--both actual and possible? Do you KNOW that God did wrong in allowing certain evils in this world? Are you in possession of all the facts so that you can logically conclude that there are absolutely no compelling reasons for God to allow the world to exist in the way it does?
You see, I am not claiming omniscience. Your position requires you to, which is, I think, another reason I find it dishonest.
And yet, at the same time, I can't help but notice that you didn't answer my question. What reason could you possibly have for not hurting people? If God doesn't exist, you surely must recognize that it doesn't matter. You, and those you hurt, both directly and indirectly, will die, and no one will remember anything. So why not live it up now while you can?
And why be good at all? When you are gone, that feeling of satisfaction will mean absolutely nothing. All of your good deeds will be of no more or less value than Stalin's Gulag or the Inquisitor's racks. So why strive for that which is meaningless?
I have a reason, and it is based is something other than myself. It is a non-selfish reason. Can you give me a reason--a RATIONAL argument--as to why you should be "good" that isn't the merely self-centered idea of "Because I want to"?