Doesn't it seem likely that the reason all of us can't see God is because there is no God?
Does it seem likely that the reason all us can't see radio waves, or ultraviolet light, etc, is because they don't exist?
Or, do they exist and we just don't have the appropriate vision to detect.
On the surface, I think the main crux of the question is valid. If God is real, then why doesn't he 'reveal' Himself?
Another, more honest question that should accompany this (If someone is sincere and honest) is, "If God is real, then why am I not experiencing His revelation? What am I responsible for that is causing me not to see with clarity? "
I would also ask, "If God isn't real, then why am I even asking questions about Him?" The question itself begs another. "Why am I asking questions about God?"
The analogy used about courtroom evidence is flawed. My reply would be, If a juror refused to show up at court and hear the evidence, or blatantly ignored vital testimony, would they be able to rule fairly? No.
The whole hide and seek accusation reveals that the article writer is starting with a faulty premise. That God is some kid, playing games with us. The writer obviously carries this bias through out all the questions asked.
Page 3 reveals more misconceptions about free will in heaven, and why we will 'bask in His presence.'
And if souls don't have free will in Heaven, doesn't that undercut the idea of our freedom being the most precious and unique gift God could have given us?
That is certainly not the most precious gift. Another faulty premise.
Why is God an exception to that rule? Why is it that with everything else in our lives, having more information makes us better able to make a free choice
Another faulty premise. Having more information will help someone make a choice. And, thus if we are asking questions about God, that means our mind has told us to seek out information. How stubborn would we be, if we said, 'well its not clear, so why should I waste my time seeking out info to get to the truth." That makes no sense.
I would argue that having more info helps people make the right choice. It is assinine to say that our prisons are full of people who just needed to have the law explained to them a little better. "Gosh, I never would have murdered that person if I'd known it was against the law." Look at flippin speed limit. They put countless numbers of signs down the road, saying, "don't exceed this. This is the LIMIT." And what do we do? We break it. How much more information do we need? Is there something that isn't revealed to us? Or, perhaps we just prefer to ignore the revelation because it doesn't comply with our own desires. It is a big wet blanket over our need for speed, and so we blatantly disregard. Until the blue lights come up behind us. Now imagines saying, "officer, the state didn't do a good enough job convincing me that the speed limit was 55 mph. They just had these little signs. I mean how can that little sign possibly be enough to convince me? In fact, how can I know that the state even exists. I've never met the officials who supposedly made these limits. How can I know they exist?"
This type of rebellious spirit would be like me saying, Barack Obama doesn't exist because He won't appear in my living room. As I read through this whole thing, I see more an more that this is another, "If God is real, then I don't like Him anyway," kind of rhetoric.