Marian Message
Posted: Fri Oct 22, 2010 9:38 pm
What is the message behind the Marian apparitions?
God bless you all!!
Francesco
God bless you all!!
Francesco
"The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands." (Psalm 19:1)
https://discussions.godandscience.org/
I did see it. It depends on what kind of answer you're looking for, really. Most folks around here will probably tell you Marian apparitions are either hoaxes or devil-induced events. For most of them I would agree with the former; for the rest (that the Church thoroughly investigated (see list here)) I would agree with the Church's conclusions.CeT-To wrote:Hopefully Byblos sees this lol
None. But I wouldn't put too much stock in any that haven't been investigated and approved by the Church.CeT-To wrote:So Byblos, which ones would you call fake or satan inspired? .. just curious.
How does what you claim reconcile with the message of the Lady of Fatima? here:Do remember one thing, though, that the Marian doctrine is Christ-centric first and foremost.
This doesn't seem Christ centered to me. Hebrews 10:10 talks about the only sacrifice that God accepts. this is also part of the message:"The Angel demonstrated to the children the fervent, attentive, and composed manner in which we should all pray, and the reverence we should show toward God in prayer. He also explained to them the great importance of praying and making sacrifices in reparation for the offenses committed against God.
Is this Christ-centered as well? Revelation 3:20 talks about the true door to enter heaven. Just some things to think about."Finally, devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, our Most Holy Mother, consists in considering Her as the seat of mercy, of goodness and of pardon, and as the sure door of entering Heaven."
What kind of sacrifices do you think is being spoken of? They're not altar sacrifices as offerings if that's what you're thinking, but simply self-sacrifice and charity. Why do you have a problem with that?RickD wrote:Byblos, you posted:How does what you claim reconcile with the message of the Lady of Fatima? here:Do remember one thing, though, that the Marian doctrine is Christ-centric first and foremost.This doesn't seem Christ centered to me. Hebrews 10:10 talks about the only sacrifice that God accepts."The Angel demonstrated to the children the fervent, attentive, and composed manner in which we should all pray, and the reverence we should show toward God in prayer. He also explained to them the great importance of praying and making sacrifices in reparation for the offenses committed against God.
In her role as intercessor, yes she is all those things. Nothing she does is of her own power and everything is through and for Christ. Catholics who don't know that are ignorant of their faith.RickD wrote:this is also part of the message:Is this Christ-centered as well? Revelation 3:20 talks about the true door to enter heaven."Finally, devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, our Most Holy Mother, consists in considering Her as the seat of mercy, of goodness and of pardon, and as the sure door of entering Heaven."
Byblos, I believe they are speaking of self- sacrifices. Giving up something important to them. Similar to what Catholics do at Lent. It's the point of making those sacrifices "in reparation for the offenses committed against God" that I have the problem with. Nothing we can do of ourselves can make amends(reparation) for our sins. Christ did that on the cross.RickD wrote:Byblos, you posted:
Do remember one thing, though, that the Marian doctrine is Christ-centric first and foremost.
How does what you claim reconcile with the message of the Lady of Fatima? here:
"The Angel demonstrated to the children the fervent, attentive, and composed manner in which we should all pray, and the reverence we should show toward God in prayer. He also explained to them the great importance of praying and making sacrifices in reparation for the offenses committed against God.
This doesn't seem Christ centered to me. Hebrews 10:10 talks about the only sacrifice that God accepts.
What kind of sacrifices do you think is being spoken of? They're not altar sacrifices as offerings if that's what you're thinking, but simply self-sacrifice and charity. Why do you have a problem with that?
First, let me preface this by saying that I'm NOT saying that YOU believe the following:RickD wrote:this is also part of the message:
"Finally, devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, our Most Holy Mother, consists in considering Her as the seat of mercy, of goodness and of pardon, and as the sure door of entering Heaven."
Is this Christ-centered as well? Revelation 3:20 talks about the true door to enter heaven.
In her role as intercessor, yes she is all those things. Nothing she does is of her own power and everything is through and for Christ. Catholics who don't know that are ignorant of their faith.
The way this is written tells me that Mary is put in a place that only God should be. Read the sentence and tell me where it says that it says anything about doing anything through and for Christ. If Catholicism teaches what you say, then when they make statements like this, it doesn't show that. When I read that sentence, I see it saying that Mary is the sure door of entering Heaven. How can one read it any other way?"Finally, devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, our Most Holy Mother, consists in considering Her as the seat of mercy, of goodness and of pardon, and as the sure door of entering Heaven."
This is telling that the sins were against Her Immaculate Heart. Not sins against God.She showed Her Heart, surrounded by piercing thorns (which represented the sins against Her Immaculate Heart),
Again, Christ already made "reparation" for ALL sin once and for all.The children also saw that God is terribly offended by the sins of humanity, and that He desires each of us and all mankind to abandon sin and make reparation for their crimes through prayer and sacrifice.
Now children can sacrifice themselves for sinners, in order to save them from hell? Is Christ's sacrifice that was once and for all, now meaningless?"The children were also told to pray and sacrifice themselves for sinners, in order to save them from hell.
Now, to save sinners, God wishes to establish devotion to "My Immaculate Heart"? Is that what the Bible says about how souls are saved from hell?You have seen hell where the souls of poor sinners go. To save them, God wishes to establish in the world devotion to My Immaculate Heart. If what I say to you is done, many souls will be saved and there will be peace.'
Now Christ isn't the way to God. Mary's Immaculate Heart is.Our Lady said, 'My Immaculate Heart will be your refuge and the way that will lead you to God.' If we wish to go to God, we have a sure way to Him through true devotion to the Immaculate Heart of His Mother.
We must make sacrifices in reparation for sins committed "against Our Lord and Our Lady"? Again, this statement is putting Mary equal to Jesus. And again stressed the "necessity of prayers and sacrifices to save poor sinners from hell". Christ's sacrifice is again made worthless. Byblos, by legitimizing this Marian apparition, the Catholic Church(the Church hierarchy, not necessarily the people in the Church)is agreeing with what the "apparition" says. If the Catholic church truly teaches what you claim, then they should have spoken out against this "apparition". This anti-biblical apparition was endorsed by the Catholic Church, correct?And we must make sacrifices, especially the sacrifice of doing our daily duty, in reparation for the sins committed against Our Lord and Our Lady. She also stressed the necessity of prayers and sacrifices to save poor sinners from hell. The Message of Fatima, to individual souls, is summarized in these things.
And who do you think is at the heart of her immaculate heart? Christ.RickD wrote:Byblos, if Catholicism teaches that Mary does what she does through the power of Christ, and not of her own power, then the apparition must not be from God. Look at the following to see my point:This is telling that the sins were against Her Immaculate Heart. Not sins against God.She showed Her Heart, surrounded by piercing thorns (which represented the sins against Her Immaculate Heart),
Only if you believe in the unbiblical doctrine of OSAS. I don't (and many Protestant denoms don't either). Note, however, the bolded part. Who is offended by the sins of humanity? It's certainly not Mary's immaculate heart (as you perceive it).RickD wrote:Again, Christ already made "reparation" for ALL sin once and for all.The children also saw that God is terribly offended by the sins of humanity, and that He desires each of us and all mankind to abandon sin and make reparation for their crimes through prayer and sacrifice.
I really don't know where you're getting this. Do you really think the children were told to sacrifice themselves? They were told to make sacrifices and to pray.RickD wrote:Now children can sacrifice themselves for sinners, in order to save them from hell? Is Christ's sacrifice that was once and for all, now meaningless?"The children were also told to pray and sacrifice themselves for sinners, in order to save them from hell.
Who is the centerpiece of her immaculate heart?RickD wrote:Now, to save sinners, God wishes to establish devotion to "My Immaculate Heart"? Is that what the Bible says about how souls are saved from hell?You have seen hell where the souls of poor sinners go. To save them, God wishes to establish in the world devotion to My Immaculate Heart. If what I say to you is done, many souls will be saved and there will be peace.'
Christ is at the center of her immaculate heart, she draws people to Him, that is her function, by the power of God.RickD wrote:Now Christ isn't the way to God. Mary's Immaculate Heart is.Our Lady said, 'My Immaculate Heart will be your refuge and the way that will lead you to God.' If we wish to go to God, we have a sure way to Him through true devotion to the Immaculate Heart of His Mother.
I really don't know if this apparition was endorsed or not but if it was it would not change a thing of what I'm saying. Look, I'm not going to debate this particular apparition line by line with you, that is not my intention. But let me leave you with a few thoughts to ponder, what is the single most visible act of devotion in Catholic theology? No, it is not Mary or praying to the saints, it is not purgatory or limbo, it is not even confession or baptism (but awfully close). It is mass my friend, daily mass. A devotion celebrated daily hundreds of thousands of times in churches around the world. I'll give you two guesses as to who is the centerpiece of that devotion Rick (and the second one don't count). Not only is Christ at the heart of this devotion, I'm certain you know we believe He IS there with us body, blood, soul and divinity in the blessed Eucharist. Catholicism is Christ-centered and EVERYTHING Marian is pointing to that center, even if it is not repeated, it is understood (or OUGHT to be at least). I understand if Non-Catholics, especially Protestants, have many misconceptions about that but I will repeat over and over until I take my dying breath, Catholics who don't know that Christ is at the heart of Catholic faith are ignorant of that faith.RickD wrote:We must make sacrifices in reparation for sins committed "against Our Lord and Our Lady"? Again, this statement is putting Mary equal to Jesus. And again stressed the "necessity of prayers and sacrifices to save poor sinners from hell". Christ's sacrifice is again made worthless. Byblos, by legitimizing this Marian apparition, the Catholic Church(the Church hierarchy, not necessarily the people in the Church)is agreeing with what the "apparition" says. If the Catholic church truly teaches what you claim, then they should have spoken out against this "apparition". This anti-biblical apparition was endorsed by the Catholic Church, correct?And we must make sacrifices, especially the sacrifice of doing our daily duty, in reparation for the sins committed against Our Lord and Our Lady. She also stressed the necessity of prayers and sacrifices to save poor sinners from hell. The Message of Fatima, to individual souls, is summarized in these things.
That's what I'm trying to tell you, Catholics ought to know better than reading it the way you do. And if they don't, they need to educate themselves in their own faith. We can blame the church all we want for perpetuating a perceived myth but we need to take responsibility for our own faith. When judgement day comes pleading ignorance of the faith is not going to shield anyone because they were members of a certain church. There is no two ways around it, if Mary is to be idolized the way non-catholics think catholics do, then catholics are really a confused bunch because when they go to mass there is not a HINT of Mary, other than perhaps an optional Hail Mary that asks for her intercessory prayers. I mean if this is not proof that the doctrine is Christ-centric I really don't know what is. The heart and soul of catholic faith is the mass and the honor of that mass falls on Christ's feet alone. Everything else is immaterial, as far as I'm concerned. If I were to sum up catholic faith in one sentence it would be the bolded part in my signature line below (which is repeated daily in every single mass).RickD wrote:Byblos, thank you for your response. I have heard this from you before, and I know what you believe. And, I know what you say the Catholic Church teaches. Where in the apparition's instructions does he say any of what you're saying? Is it supposed to be assumed? Because just from reading the instructions of the apparition like I did, I would never infer what you're saying. I'm guessing that many Catholics would also read it the way I did. If that is an accurate guess on my part, who's responsible for perpetuating the false idolization of Mary?
Byblos, every Catholic mass I've been to is mostly about Mary, and rituals. There has only been a "hint" of the real Jesus. Masses, funerals, weddings, etc. My wife and her family have had the same experience as I did. There was no Biblical Gospel preached at any Mass they attended.Byblos wrote:That's what I'm trying to tell you, Catholics ought to know better than reading it the way you do. And if they don't, they need to educate themselves in their own faith. We can blame the church all we want for perpetuating a perceived myth but we need to take responsibility for our own faith. When judgement day comes pleading ignorance of the faith is not going to shield anyone because they were members of a certain church. There is no two ways around it, if Mary is to be idolized the way non-catholics think catholics do, then catholics are really a confused bunch because when they go to mass there is not a HINT of Mary, other than perhaps an optional Hail Mary that asks for her intercessory prayers. I mean if this is not proof that the doctrine is Christ-centric I really don't know what is. The heart and soul of catholic faith is the mass and the honor of that mass falls on Christ's feet alone. Everything else is immaterial, as far as I'm concerned. If I were to sum up catholic faith in one sentence it would be the bolded part in my signature line below (which is repeated daily in every single mass).RickD wrote:Byblos, thank you for your response. I have heard this from you before, and I know what you believe. And, I know what you say the Catholic Church teaches. Where in the apparition's instructions does he say any of what you're saying? Is it supposed to be assumed? Because just from reading the instructions of the apparition like I did, I would never infer what you're saying. I'm guessing that many Catholics would also read it the way I did. If that is an accurate guess on my part, who's responsible for perpetuating the false idolization of Mary?