The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society and the Trinity
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 7:01 am
What's their story?
John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. NIV
The Watchtower's New World Translation renders the third clause of this verse: "The Word was a god."
What?
Now read this link all the way through (it should take no longer than 5 or 10 minutes) and see how these people distort the Word and how they distort the Trinitarian views of the early Christians:
The Watchtower and its apologists justify this translation by citing context ("The Word cannot be the God He is with") and a host of grammatical suppositions ( 2 ). Numerous scholars refute the Watchtower's position on the same grounds of context and grammar ( 3 ). An effective argument can also be made by considering what early Christians believed about Jesus and His divinity. Most of them were fluent in the Koine Greek of the Fourth Gospel, and, in the case of Ignatius of Antioch (see below), were instructed by John the Apostle himself. Thus, if their writings reflect the Son as a secondary god or created angel, the Watchtower position is strengthened. However, if their writings present Jesus as fully divine and co-equal with the Father, Trinitarian scholarship gains powerful support.
http://www.spotlightministries.org.uk/e ... arians.htm
So we need to find out what is going on behind the scenes with this group - what is it? Why distort early Christian writings in order to support a theological view which is obviously flimsy in the first place and must therefore alert the perpetrators’ supporters to this fabrication? Are this religion’s adherents encouraged to investigate?
blessings
John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. NIV
The Watchtower's New World Translation renders the third clause of this verse: "The Word was a god."
What?
Now read this link all the way through (it should take no longer than 5 or 10 minutes) and see how these people distort the Word and how they distort the Trinitarian views of the early Christians:
The Watchtower and its apologists justify this translation by citing context ("The Word cannot be the God He is with") and a host of grammatical suppositions ( 2 ). Numerous scholars refute the Watchtower's position on the same grounds of context and grammar ( 3 ). An effective argument can also be made by considering what early Christians believed about Jesus and His divinity. Most of them were fluent in the Koine Greek of the Fourth Gospel, and, in the case of Ignatius of Antioch (see below), were instructed by John the Apostle himself. Thus, if their writings reflect the Son as a secondary god or created angel, the Watchtower position is strengthened. However, if their writings present Jesus as fully divine and co-equal with the Father, Trinitarian scholarship gains powerful support.
http://www.spotlightministries.org.uk/e ... arians.htm
So we need to find out what is going on behind the scenes with this group - what is it? Why distort early Christian writings in order to support a theological view which is obviously flimsy in the first place and must therefore alert the perpetrators’ supporters to this fabrication? Are this religion’s adherents encouraged to investigate?
blessings