lutheran changing over time???
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 2:36 am
I'm not sure this really belongs in abberant christianity, but i recently started a study on the Lutheran church for a friend and found some things that just don't add up to me. Most of my info comes from a modern English trasnlation of the small catechism written by Martin Luther himself. All doctrinal issues aside I've noticed some suspicious things that get me wondering if somone, somwhere has been trying to change Lutheran churches back into catholic churches. for example:
the title of the catechism's section on baptism calls it "the SACREMENT of holy baptism" and Luther's description of it does tend to make me believe he understood it as a type of magical event, but in a couple of his other writings he clearly and repeatedly calls baptism an ORDINANCE, meaning symbolic. totally the opposite of a sacrement...hmmm. then i hear of some lutheran churches practicing baptism by sprinkling and pouring the water over a person's head, yet a text from Luther himself states quite clearly that he teaches and prefers total immersion because that is the meaning of the word found in Greek scripture. very odd
then there is the whole issue of confession. in the catechism it gives examples of the convo between a confessor and the person confessing (apparently a confessor is like the pastor). In it the question is asked "do you believe my forgiveness is God's forgiveness?" and the person confessing is supposed to say "yes". Now doesn't that go against what protestantism was fighting for? They saw the Roman chrch replacing God's authority and power with regular people and knew it was wrong. so how could Luther have believed that the forgiveness of a human being is the same as god's forgiveness of sin? that doesnt make any sense to me. Then there was this little disclaimer on the modern catechism that said " this question was not in the original catechism and may not have been written by Luther, but reflects his teachings and was added during his lifetime". All i could think after reading that was "says you". Something very fishy is going on here...or maybe it's just my imagination??
the title of the catechism's section on baptism calls it "the SACREMENT of holy baptism" and Luther's description of it does tend to make me believe he understood it as a type of magical event, but in a couple of his other writings he clearly and repeatedly calls baptism an ORDINANCE, meaning symbolic. totally the opposite of a sacrement...hmmm. then i hear of some lutheran churches practicing baptism by sprinkling and pouring the water over a person's head, yet a text from Luther himself states quite clearly that he teaches and prefers total immersion because that is the meaning of the word found in Greek scripture. very odd
then there is the whole issue of confession. in the catechism it gives examples of the convo between a confessor and the person confessing (apparently a confessor is like the pastor). In it the question is asked "do you believe my forgiveness is God's forgiveness?" and the person confessing is supposed to say "yes". Now doesn't that go against what protestantism was fighting for? They saw the Roman chrch replacing God's authority and power with regular people and knew it was wrong. so how could Luther have believed that the forgiveness of a human being is the same as god's forgiveness of sin? that doesnt make any sense to me. Then there was this little disclaimer on the modern catechism that said " this question was not in the original catechism and may not have been written by Luther, but reflects his teachings and was added during his lifetime". All i could think after reading that was "says you". Something very fishy is going on here...or maybe it's just my imagination??