http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41tR4uM21XU
Richard Dawkins looking smarter then ive ever seen him
- KBCid
- Senior Member
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:16 am
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Undecided
Re: Richard Dawkins looking smarter then ive ever seen him
You give him too much credit Bipp!
We can easily see this was all intelligently designed but I'm sure he will argue that this event evolved by the natural actions of some chemicals in the brain....
lol.
We can easily see this was all intelligently designed but I'm sure he will argue that this event evolved by the natural actions of some chemicals in the brain....
lol.
It is as if some Christians sit there and wait for the smallest thing that they can dispute and then jump onto it...
The Bible says that we were each given an interpretation – this gift of interpretation is not there so we can run each other into the ground. It is there for our MUTUAL edification.
//www.allaboutgod.net/profiles/blogs/chri ... each-other
The Bible says that we were each given an interpretation – this gift of interpretation is not there so we can run each other into the ground. It is there for our MUTUAL edification.
//www.allaboutgod.net/profiles/blogs/chri ... each-other
-
- Advanced Senior Member
- Posts: 889
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:09 pm
- Christian: No
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: I don't believe in creation
- Location: Scotland
Re: Richard Dawkins looking smarter then ive ever seen him
I enjoyed the Bishop Harries/ Prof.Dawkins conversation. Nice to see a man of faith and an atheist engaging in something other than a celebrity death match.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQ0WinCWtLs
I get the feeling WLC would have pwned Dawkins if he did turn up. Regardless of stance Craig is far superior philosopher to Dawkins, a real celebrity deathmatch would have been more evenly matched and far more entertaining.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQ0WinCWtLs
I get the feeling WLC would have pwned Dawkins if he did turn up. Regardless of stance Craig is far superior philosopher to Dawkins, a real celebrity deathmatch would have been more evenly matched and far more entertaining.
-
- Prestigious Senior Member
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:56 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Day-Age
Re: Richard Dawkins looking smarter then ive ever seen him
Hehehehe, maybe dawkins came from natural selection , but its very apparent that WLC's intellect was streamline designedKBCid wrote:You give him too much credit Bipp!
We can easily see this was all intelligently designed but I'm sure he will argue that this event evolved by the natural actions of some chemicals in the brain....
lol.
Dawkins was also challenged by a large shroud of turin conference but he also failed to show up there too.
Seems like his specialty is no-shows.
-
- Prestigious Senior Member
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:56 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Day-Age
Re: Richard Dawkins looking smarter then ive ever seen him
The problem I have with Dawkins is that he makes philosophical statements and wont back them up. At least with Hitchens he wasnt afraid to engage wlc. Hitchens got his clock cleaned but he took it like a man.Proinsias wrote:I enjoyed the Bishop Harries/ Prof.Dawkins conversation. Nice to see a man of faith and an atheist engaging in something other than a celebrity death match.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQ0WinCWtLs
I get the feeling WLC would have pwned Dawkins if he did turn up. Regardless of stance Craig is far superior philosopher to Dawkins, a real celebrity deathmatch would have been more evenly matched and far more entertaining.
-
- Board Moderator
- Posts: 9224
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 12:29 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Theistic Evolution
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Richard Dawkins looking smarter then ive ever seen him
Dawkins has a video where he interviews McGrath.
There is an unedited version also.
I don't think Dawkins is as much of an ass as he comes off at times.
There is an unedited version also.
I don't think Dawkins is as much of an ass as he comes off at times.
-
- Valued Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 4:10 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Day-Age
- Location: Belfast
- Contact:
Re: Richard Dawkins looking smarter then ive ever seen him
I personally find Dawkins ok to listen to, I think his views are obviously and evidently flawed in many areas but he is entertaining to listen to. However, anyone who asks the question "Who created God?" and makes the statement "Natural selection accounts for its own existence" frankly does not deserve to be labelled as an expert in science nor philosophy.
SB.
SB.
-
- Prestigious Senior Member
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:56 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Day-Age
Re: Richard Dawkins looking smarter then ive ever seen him
First off cool name Sam(also my dads name ).Sam1995 wrote:I personally find Dawkins ok to listen to, I think his views are obviously and evidently flawed in many areas but he is entertaining to listen to. However, anyone who asks the question "Who created God?" and makes the statement "Natural selection accounts for its own existence" frankly does not deserve to be labelled as an expert in science nor philosophy.
SB.
Yea dawkins seems more like a populous then an intellectual.
It's amazing that he has a heard of blind sheep following him right off the intellectual cliff lol.
-
- Valued Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 4:10 pm
- Christian: Yes
- Sex: Male
- Creation Position: Day-Age
- Location: Belfast
- Contact:
Re: Richard Dawkins looking smarter then ive ever seen him
I'm not going to ignore his intelligence, that would just be arrogant of me. However, a man of that intelligence should have sufficient knowledge to know the opposing arguments to the arguments he presents in his books, debates, etc. Maybe this is unfair of me to say, but I honestly don't think he does, I think he has a vast knowledge of his own arguments and not a very vast understanding of the opposing arguments of Christianity. As a man of power within atheism who writes books and debates all over the world, I think that is a potentially dangerous mix.bippy123 wrote:First off cool name Sam(also my dads name ).Sam1995 wrote:I personally find Dawkins ok to listen to, I think his views are obviously and evidently flawed in many areas but he is entertaining to listen to. However, anyone who asks the question "Who created God?" and makes the statement "Natural selection accounts for its own existence" frankly does not deserve to be labelled as an expert in science nor philosophy.
SB.
Yea dawkins seems more like a populous then an intellectual.
It's amazing that he has a heard of blind sheep following him right off the intellectual cliff lol.
Thank you for the compliment friend!
SB
"There are far, far better things ahead than any we leave behind." - C.S Lewis