Evidence for God from Science

I do like WLC response to this question.

http://www.reasonablefaith.org/are-my-a ... onsensical

Foolish people aplenty in this world.

The only legit doubters of Christ's existence are those that doubt that the Christ of the NT existed, not that the MAN existed.
Many times people that are zealous in their skepticism confuse that distinguished and make silly claims that historians/history proved that Christ never existed.
As for the rest of his argument, you can see that this person has no idea what Christianity is about or what defines a person as a "Christian".

I learned a new word-prevaricator. I feel smarter now.

pre·var·i·cate (pr-vr-kt)

intr.v. pre·var·i·cat·ed, pre·var·i·cat·ing, pre·var·i·cates

To stray from or evade the truth; equivocate. See Synonyms at lie2.

I am actually surprised that WLC wasted his time on that question, must have been a slow week.

Danieltwotwenty wrote:I am actually surprised that WLC wasted his time on that question, must have been a slow week.

Aye you are probably right.

Silvertusk wrote:

Danieltwotwenty wrote:I am actually surprised that WLC wasted his time on that question, must have been a slow week.

Aye you are probably right.

Once in a while you have to answer such a question or ppl think you can't counter apposing arguments