Evidence for God from Science

I was wondering if anyone could present valid arguments for objective rather than subjective morals.

No. All morals resolve to opinions. They are merely concepts formed by biased subjective brains.

Actually, this topic has been discussed quite a bit here. Start with this.

I think that it is very hard to separate a moral from the society culture that it is influence by ( or vice-versa) , so to a certain degree all morals are subjective.
That said, there is a universal view that morals DO exist and there is a universal view that doing something harmful to a person is bad, so in that regard, there seems to be a Objective ( absolute) moral.

29qr63 wrote:No. All morals resolve to opinions. They are merely concepts formed by biased subjective brains.

Prove it!!

This question is directly connected to the question of whether God exists. If there is a God and he has given us standards of right and wrong then his commands constitute objective morality. If there isn't then there can be no such thing as objective morality.

theophilus wrote:This question is directly connected to the question of whether God exists. If there is a God and he has given us standards of right and wrong then his commands constitute objective morality. If there isn't then there can be no such thing as objective morality.

Yes...

Summed up by humanities need to know right from wrong and God's intervention to define right and wrong to satisfy the need...
-
-
-

Baltazorg wrote:I was wondering if anyone could present valid arguments for objective rather than subjective morals.

There is no proof that objective moral arguments exist only that if God does exist then they do.