Page 1 of 1
An Apology
Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 4:23 am
by YoungApolegist
I am sorry if I offend somebody by my posts. I know I have brought up some controversial topics ( and made fun of Richard Dawkins), but I sincerely wish the best for everybody on this board. I am socially awkward, so it is hard for me to bring up certain topics without sounding offensive. If anybody feels offended by my posts, please pm me with your concerns. I brought up in a previous thread that I don't have the best social skills, but I try my best. To Danieltwotwenty ( regarding my thread titled " The Foolishness of Richard Dawkins") I sincerely did not mean to suggest that I hate Richard Dawkins, but I feel that he is a bad seed that will produce bad fruit if it is watered. Regardless, I just wanted people to know that I mean no harm to anybody.
Re: An Apology
Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 4:32 am
by Danieltwotwenty
No harm mate, we all fall short in different areas but as long as we look out for each other and let each other know when they are straying from the path of righteousness we will be ok.
It takes a real man to admit when he has made a mistake.
Re: An Apology
Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 5:41 am
by Stu
Never apologise for making fun of Richard Dawkins
Re: An Apology
Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 7:13 am
by 1over137
He is also a human being.
Re: An Apology
Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 8:28 am
by neo-x
No apologies needed man, ur among friends.
Re: An Apology
Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 10:09 am
by Stu
1over137 wrote:He is also a human being.
Heck people around here make more fun of Ken Ham than RD around here
I think RD can handle a couple jibes.
Re: An Apology
Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 1:24 pm
by RickD
Stu wrote:1over137 wrote:He is also a human being.
Heck people around here make more fun of Ken Ham than RD around here
I think RD can handle a couple jibes.
Who is Ken Ham?
Re: An Apology
Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 1:51 pm
by YoungApolegist
RickD wrote:Stu wrote:1over137 wrote:He is also a human being.
Heck people around here make more fun of Ken Ham than RD around here
I think RD can handle a couple jibes.
Who is Ken Ham?
Maybe it's cliche to make fun of Richard Dawkins.
Re: An Apology
Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 3:18 pm
by Danieltwotwenty
RickD wrote:Stu wrote:1over137 wrote:He is also a human being.
Heck people around here make more fun of Ken Ham than RD around here
I think RD can handle a couple jibes.
Who is Ken Ham?
Only Ham I know is the kind that makes bacon.
Re: An Apology
Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 4:07 pm
by RickD
Never mind. I googled Ken Ham. It seems he's a retired astronaut.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Ham
Re: An Apology
Posted: Mon May 19, 2014 12:43 am
by Silvertusk
RickD wrote:Stu wrote:1over137 wrote:He is also a human being.
Heck people around here make more fun of Ken Ham than RD around here
I think RD can handle a couple jibes.
Who is Ken Ham?
Re: An Apology
Posted: Tue May 20, 2014 8:52 am
by PaulSacramento
Considering some of the horrific and hateful things that Dawkins says about religion and believers, it is quite natural to feel negative about the man.
One would think that a scientist would simply allow science to speak for itself, but Dawkins feels that need to be insulting and condescending.
Which just makes him come off as having to rely on insults and pretentious attitude.