(2014) Norman Geisler Responds to Ken Ham
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 3:37 pm
"A Response to Ken Ham and Answers in Genesis on Does Inerrancy Require a Belief in a Young Earth?"
By Norman L. Geisler
http://www.normgeisler.com/articles/Bib ... %20AIG.pdf
BTW, Geisler once held to a Young Earth viewpoint. And, interestingly, he hopes the Young Earth view IS correct.
Further, he states that his purpose of writing this article is that "it is aimed answering the question of whether belief in inerrancy demands a Young earth View. My point was NOT to determine whether the earth is young or old. Nor was the point to deny a connection between belief in the historical grammatical method of interpretation and the doctrine of inerrancy."
By Norman L. Geisler
http://www.normgeisler.com/articles/Bib ... %20AIG.pdf
BTW, Geisler once held to a Young Earth viewpoint. And, interestingly, he hopes the Young Earth view IS correct.
Further, he states that his purpose of writing this article is that "it is aimed answering the question of whether belief in inerrancy demands a Young earth View. My point was NOT to determine whether the earth is young or old. Nor was the point to deny a connection between belief in the historical grammatical method of interpretation and the doctrine of inerrancy."
