Church in the UK
Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2015 9:09 pm
This is a little question for Storyteller and any other UK (well, mainly England) -connected people. I was reading a very interesting book on the history of private life - you know, what people did every day in the past - which focussed a lot on England. It said that country Church of England (known around here as Anglican and in the US as Episcopalian, I think) clergy in the 1800's only needed to have some kind of university qualification and didn't need to be particularly passionate about God at all; apparently they often just read a sermon from a book each week. Consequently they had a lot of time on their hands and some of them used it in interesting ways - coming up with useful inventions for example.
I was also a bit baffled by the titles they had - 'parson' signifying any C of E minister, then 'rector' which was senior to (or had a bigger congregation than, or something) 'vicar'. Of course I'd heard of and been confused by all these terms before, but I realised how little relation they bore to the titles of most of the church leaders I've actually known of, considering they've been the standard ones in England. I've also always had the impression that the C of E is still tradition-bound and pretty religiously hollow.
I have heard of some C of E churches that seem more like 'proper' Bible-believing, evangelistic ones (thinking of the Alpha course association) and I know there are lots of other denominations in the UK now, but I'm just wondering what your impression is of the C of E? Are they generally still pretty tradition-bound or does it vary a lot? I guess I'm wondering because there are lots of people with British ancestry in this part of the world but the Anglican churches don't predominate by any means - not these days anyway. There's the possibility that churches can be tradition-bound but still Bible-believing and genuine, but I really don't know much about it.
I was also a bit baffled by the titles they had - 'parson' signifying any C of E minister, then 'rector' which was senior to (or had a bigger congregation than, or something) 'vicar'. Of course I'd heard of and been confused by all these terms before, but I realised how little relation they bore to the titles of most of the church leaders I've actually known of, considering they've been the standard ones in England. I've also always had the impression that the C of E is still tradition-bound and pretty religiously hollow.
I have heard of some C of E churches that seem more like 'proper' Bible-believing, evangelistic ones (thinking of the Alpha course association) and I know there are lots of other denominations in the UK now, but I'm just wondering what your impression is of the C of E? Are they generally still pretty tradition-bound or does it vary a lot? I guess I'm wondering because there are lots of people with British ancestry in this part of the world but the Anglican churches don't predominate by any means - not these days anyway. There's the possibility that churches can be tradition-bound but still Bible-believing and genuine, but I really don't know much about it.