Evidence for God from Science

Earlier I posted a link about something Ken Ham said about Old earth creationism and I implied that Ken ham thinks we are heretics if we believe in an old earth and I misrepresented what Ken Ham said,and I apologize to any I offended,I was wrong.

Instead I should have explained that what Ken Ham said does not apply to the Gap Theory interpretation and I did not do that,instead I misrepresented what Ken Ham said and I apologize. I will never again do anything like this again however I do disagree with the young earth creation interpretation and I will continue to explain why in a respectful brother in Christ way when the opportunity presents itself. I think we benefit from these kinds of discussions.

abelcainsbrother wrote:I think we benefit from these kinds of discussions.

I don't think we benefit at all from axe grinding. Seeing sparks fly just isn't for me.

Furstentum Liechtenstein wrote:

abelcainsbrother wrote:I think we benefit from these kinds of discussions.

I don't think we benefit at all from axe grinding. Seeing sparks fly just isn't for me.

RickD wrote:

Furstentum Liechtenstein wrote:

abelcainsbrother wrote:I think we benefit from these kinds of discussions.

I don't think we benefit at all from axe grinding. Seeing sparks fly just isn't for me.

A few sparks don't cut it for me either...
I much prefer a lot of fireworks going off!
The bigger the explosion, the better.

I just wish Ken Ham would apologise to me.

Apology accepted. And K, I'd be okay with saying that if KH doesn't apologize to you by the end of the week (sidenote: I'd never ask him to apologise . . . that's just silly), then we could just permaban him! Id' be really hurt if he never showed up here again at G&S.