Evidence for God from Science

Anyone read it? What is the general reaction of people in US to those who say he raped them and Hillarirs covering?

Kurieuo wrote:Anyone read it? What is the general reaction of people in US to those who say he raped them and Hillarirs covering?

Do you have a link? I never heard of Hillary or Bill doing anything wrong. I don't believe anything that is against the clintons. They are both upstanding citizens.

I'm not sure of any one link that'd be best. Google turns up a lot on Clinton's raping, some stories which were even violent, and then Hillaries silencing or muddying his victims.

Here's an article I found that covers it: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... -on-women/

That's nothing more than right-wing drivel.

Stop buying into the conservative agenda against the clintons. Billary has done nothing wrong.

Breitbart isn't a credible source. If they tell you that water is wet you should get independent confirmation.

And no, I haven't heard of those particular charges, nor do I find them likely. The Clinton's are an extremely powerful family, but they also have extremely powerful enemies - enemies who have been looking to take them out for decades. If those enemies have an easy head shot - and Bill the serial rapist and Hillary the fixer would definitely be an easy head shot - then why haven't they taken it? Why is it a conspiracy theory floating around on the lunatic fringe rather than a front page story all over the world? Why aren't Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, and Mike Pence condemning the Clinton rape machine from the halls of Congress and on the campaign trail?

Maybe because it's [nonsense]?

Sorry if it's not on any of your leftist Clinton-controlled propaganda news sites. But, there is a fallacy you know, called, the genetic fallacy. People can look into the details for themselves.

When you have Hillary laughing about getting a rapist of a 12 year old girl off, talking very proudly about it and laughing about it all, it all seems apparent she doesn't have an empathetic bone in her body and is quite amoral. Shows to me she just sees many things as just a game, no matter whose life or at what cost.

Kurieuo wrote:Sorry if it's not on any of your leftist Clinton-controlled propaganda news sites.

Or the Wall Street Journal, or FOX News, or you know, anywhere other than the lunatic fringe.

edwardmurphy wrote:

Kurieuo wrote:Sorry if it's not on any of your leftist Clinton-controlled propaganda news sites.

Or the Wall Street Journal, or FOX News, or you know, anywhere other than the lunatic fringe.

You made me smile.

That's what I'm here for.

edwardmurphy wrote:Breitbart isn't a credible source. If they tell you that water is wet you should get independent confirmation.

And no, I haven't heard of those particular charges, nor do I find them likely. The Clinton's are an extremely powerful family, but they also have extremely powerful enemies - enemies who have been looking to take them out for decades. If those enemies have an easy head shot - and Bill the serial rapist and Hillary the fixer would definitely be an easy head shot - then why haven't they taken it? Why is it a conspiracy theory floating around on the lunatic fringe rather than a front page story all over the world? Why aren't Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, and Mike Pence condemning the Clinton rape machine from the halls of Congress and on the campaign trail?

Maybe because it's [nonsense]?

Why? Because of bias and anytime it comes up in the liberal news media they always spin it as consensual sex and not rape and they bring up Monica Lewinsky which was consensual sex.They try to make Bill Clinton out to be a cheater because they know people won't care much if it is consensual and ignore these women who accuse Bill Clinton of rape.You won't see these women on ABC,CBS,NBC,CNN,MSNBC,CNBC,Fox News being interviewed about it and especially now in election season when they are helping Hillary. Sean Hannity has to tread carefully when he brings it up,especially on Fox News.Fox News is getting more liberal now that Ailes is out at Fox and the WSJ has never liked Trump. You know both the Republican establishment and liberals do not like Trump.But it is on Fox News as Sean Hannity has mentioned the women who accuse Bill Clinton of sexual assault and they explain how Hillary used intimidation to silence them.Think Bill Cosby because it is not just one or two women but a bunch.

Point taken Ed. I'm wondering, does Assange belong in this category? As I see it "conspiracies" of substance that reveal truth, while such might be seen by the bad apple they're against as being conspiracies, since they don't align with their "truth"... conspiracies or not, time will show us the truth and it might be sooner than people realise. I just hope you're prepared for your bubble to be popped.

You people really need to quit picking on Mrs. Clinton.

Let's give her the benefit of doubt. She at least has earned that, from her impeccable past record.

I heard she's been nominated for sainthood.

Saint Hillary-patron saint of honesty.

I'm not sure what you mean. Wikileaks isn't a news network. As far as I know they just disseminate huge piles of raw data with no editorial oversight whatsoever.

As far as what constitutes a conspiracy, I don't really have a definition but I know it if I see it. If, for example, it's a story that would cause a massive, campaign-destroying scandal for Hillary Clinton if it got out, but somehow it can't seem to spread past InfoWars and Breitbart then I figure it's a [nonsense] conspiracy theory. If Wikileaks dumps 12,000 page of evidence that Bill Clinton is a serial rapist and his wife is his fixer then the story will go mainstream - not because it will be too big to cover up with political assassinations, but because, unlike now, it will be supported by concrete evidence.

So are you telling me that Wikileaks is going to pop my bubble by proving InfoWars and Breitbart correct? That seems unlikely, but I'll brace myself just in case.