Kurieuo wrote:Something we can agree upon Melanie.
![Give me a hug y>:D<](./images/smilies/yahoo/60.gif)
Had to happen sooner or later
Syria definitely brings up some interesting questions. I actually feel bad saying that quite flippantly on the back of so many that have suffered. I am acutely aware and saddened by the massive loss suffered in this region.
This for me was a driving reason as to the importance of the reasons and history behind the conflict. As in the past has been my interest in Libya and Iraq.
I can say that any dire reason to protect the interests of the people in these regions as any type of reasoning is so flawed it borders on stupidity to argue such.
One may argue whether it's 'acceptable' to acknowledge that personal profit by way of national interest, economics and military gain is justifiable in toppling and 'chess playing' the Middle East but at least it would honest.
At some point when you play such a hand, you may expect or at the very least anticipate that others on the same chess board may grow tired of a manipulated game play and instead of remaining silent pawns may start 'Positioning' themselves with players that serve their interests better.
Russia is not an innocent bystander, without its own interests but they are a significant piece of the 'play' who are positioning themselves, quite cleverly against they guy who keeps throwing all the pieces, not playing fairly, grabbing the chess board and arrogantly claiming the 'win'.
I think it will be a very interesting time to come.
Countries internally disintegrate before they are disabled. History has shown this.
It also shows that every dynasty, super power and regime reaches its imperialism then is surpassed by another.
That is just how the history of mankind has unfolded.
In every century across every age.
If not now, is only a matter of time till when really.