Page 1 of 1
The Clinton 'body count'
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 6:14 pm
by Nessa
Maybe there is already a thread on this but awhile ago kerry showed me a list of deaths possibly associated with the Clintons. Just wondering what people think about this?
Re: The Clinton 'body count'
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 6:17 pm
by RickD
Nessa wrote:Maybe there is already a thread on this but awhile ago kerry showed me a list of deaths possibly associated with the Clintons. Just wondering what people think about this?
Link or ban.
Re: The Clinton 'body count'
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 6:21 pm
by Nessa
RickD wrote:Nessa wrote:Maybe there is already a thread on this but awhile ago kerry showed me a list of deaths possibly associated with the Clintons. Just wondering what people think about this?
Link or ban.
https://www.google.co.nz/amp/lasvegas.c ... sonymobile
Re: The Clinton 'body count'
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 6:23 pm
by abelcainsbrother
Nessa wrote:Maybe there is already a thread on this but awhile ago kerry showed me a list of deaths possibly associated with the Clintons. Just wondering what people think about this?
Just Google Clinton body count,5 deaths in 6 weeks,etc.
Re: The Clinton 'body count'
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 7:34 pm
by Kurieuo
Seth Rich was suspected to be hit for leaking/about the leak something major. The latest, is that the Kremlin suspects Hillary's involvement with
two known UFO researchers who had direct communication with Podesta.
Re: The Clinton 'body count'
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 1:00 pm
by JButler
Not sure what to think. Possibly a long series of coincidences. However given HRC's extremely violent temper and intense hatred its could be possible. Also, the media has known this since the Clinton's were in Arkansas but have smothered any stories. FWIW Bill has an infamous temper but again the media has edited this from any stories.
Re: The Clinton 'body count'
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 3:29 pm
by Philip
One thing to keep in mind is that just because there are a million conspiracy theories and nuts that flock to every new one, that doesn't mean that sometimes there aren't also seemingly fantastical assertions that actually have a significant factual basis, but that get ignored because, on the surface, they SOUND too far-fetched. But we know from all kinds of aggressive people in positions of power, from organized crime figure to those part of the the well-oiled political machines that operated unchecked during the long era of in which press scrutiny in this country was basically non-existent, that various organizations, whether enabled by great secrecy or because they were basically operated with virtually no scrutiny, such people ruthlessly pressed all of the buttons they wanted to, so as to make things come out in ways favorable to their agendas and desires. Shocking stuff that is now a matter of history. So, why would we think ruthless, dangerous plots and agendas no longer exist? Has human nature changed so much, just because we now have 24/7 media all around (even though much of it only highly selectively reports)?