Evidence for God from Science

The REAL questions aren't about Trump's excesses at perceived attacks - those are normal for him.

The real questions are:

WAS there significant voter fraud? I'm sure there was some. How MUCH, was it significant in changing the results - we'd need to see some systemic proof of such. As for which side would be more likely and have greater opportunity at such fraud - I'd say the Left. And based upon WHAT exactly, is there any plausible reasons for a recount? And by getting behind that effort, Hillary may have risked prosecution that might otherwise not happen. We'll see.

Philip wrote:The REAL questions aren't about Trump's excesses at perceived attacks - those are normal for him.

The real questions are:

WAS there significant voter fraud? I'm sure there was some. How MUCH, was it significant in changing the results - we'd need to see some systemic proof of such. As for which side would be more likely and have greater opportunity at such fraud - I'd say the Left. And based upon WHAT exactly, is there any plausible reasons for a recount? And by getting behind that effort, Hillary may have risked prosecution that might otherwise not happen. We'll see.

First off the Washington Post cannot be trusted,as they were totally wrong althroughout this election. They are just trying to continue to make Trump look bad as they did throughout this election and are just continuing to do so. We know for a fact that the Governor of Virginia Terry McCaulif (spelling?) Who is big friends with the Clinton's allowed illegals to register to vote and yet the media says there is no evidence. I think Trump is setting them up and will let them ramble on and on about no evidence and at the right time will provide it making them look even worse than they already do. Even Fox news has amnesia about this.

But even more we know they tried to steal this election from Trump and are still trying to do it all the while acting like they are'nt. They are trying to delegitimize this election and yet just expect Trump to shut-up and take it as the media always has,he is not allowed to hit back,don't ya know? But there was election and voter fraud but only a landslide win can defeat election fraud. The media ignores this even when they themselves have done stories about election fraud outside of election season and now have amnesia and are playing dumb.But yet Trump is a conspiracy theorist talking about how the system is rigged.

Alex Jones has nailed them about it many of times pointing out their hypocrisy with articles that the media did about election fraud,yet now they are playing dumb and calling Trump a conspiracy theorist.Plus Alex Jones has interviewed election fraud experts like Beverly Harris that the media ignores.

https://www.google.com/search?client=ta ... 9nE9dcCZNU

Philip wrote:WAS there significant voter fraud? I'm sure there was some. How MUCH, was it significant in changing the results - we'd need to see some systemic proof of such. As for which side would be more likely and have greater opportunity at such fraud - I'd say the Left.

Why would you say the Left would have more opportunity than the Right? The Republicans control the majority of state and county governments, so it would seem like they'd have just as many opportunities as the Democrats, if not more. Do you have some sort of evidence to support your suspicions?

edwardmurphy wrote:

Philip wrote:WAS there significant voter fraud? I'm sure there was some. How MUCH, was it significant in changing the results - we'd need to see some systemic proof of such. As for which side would be more likely and have greater opportunity at such fraud - I'd say the Left.

Why would you say the Left would have more opportunity than the Right? The Republicans control the majority of state and county governments, so it would seem like they'd have just as many opportunities as the Democrats, if not more. Do you have some sort of evidence to support your suspicions?

When are you going to learn to not trust the mainstream news media and the left that are now saying there is no evidence illegals voted like Trump said? The media is contradicting its self.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... last-ditc/

It looks like truth and facts are just as meaningless to Trump the President-Elect as they were to Trump the Candidate.

Trump won the election (electoral college) fair and square ... It doesn't matter that he lost the popular vote.
I just don't understand why Trump continues to go off on these stupid self-destructive tangents.

It's going to be a loooooong four years!

Glass is 1/16th full time... Hillary won't be picking Supreme Court Justices... which is a good thing from my perspective.

My .02

DBowling wrote:It looks like truth and facts are just as meaningless to Trump the President-Elect as they were to Trump the Candidate.

Trump won the election (electoral college) fair and square ... It doesn't matter that he lost the popular vote.
I just don't understand why Trump continues to go off on these stupid self-destructive tangents.

It's going to be a loooooong four years!

Glass is 1/16th full time... Hillary won't be picking Supreme Court Justices... which is a good thing from my perspective.

My .02

I like it when Trump hits these bullies back attacking him.I did not like when George W Bush just ignored their attacks and it ruined him politically because he just ignored them.

abelcainsbrother wrote:When are you going to learn to not trust the mainstream news media and the left that are now saying there is no evidence illegals voted like Trump said? The media is contradicting its self.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... last-ditc/

That article has literally nothing to do with voting.

Ed: Why would you say the Left would have more opportunity than the Right?

Because if we're talking about non-tech ways of cheating, the demographics of those (in large numbers) illegally voting that would vote for Democrats is far less likely to go undetected. But as for high-tech opportunities, yes, there are many ways for criminals of all political stripes to pull fraudulent stuff.