Evidence for God from Science

And that there's a conspiracy to hide it?
Or is this YECs misleading people?

thatkidakayoungguy wrote:And that there's a conspiracy to hide it?
Or is this YECs misleading people?

You're going to need to provide a link.

RickD wrote:

thatkidakayoungguy wrote:And that there's a conspiracy to hide it?
Or is this YECs misleading people?

You're going to need to provide a link.

Figured YECs here would know. Or rather some on here, like maybe you since you were one.
http://www.creationwiki.org/Neanderthal
They were humans for sure, just different.

When I said you're going to need to provide a link, I meant a link that someone past the age of three, would take seriously.

RickD wrote:When I said you're going to need to provide a link, I meant a link that someone past the age of three, would take seriously.

Don't be so sarcastic-besides some users here take it seriously.

thatkidakayoungguy wrote:

RickD wrote:When I said you're going to need to provide a link, I meant a link that someone past the age of three, would take seriously.

Don't be so sarcastic-besides some users here take it seriously.

Ok then. Yes, it's true. The entire link.

RickD wrote:

thatkidakayoungguy wrote:

RickD wrote:When I said you're going to need to provide a link, I meant a link that someone past the age of three, would take seriously.

Don't be so sarcastic-besides some users here take it seriously.

Ok then. Yes, it's true. The entire link.

You need to change your creation position.

RickD wrote:When I said you're going to need to provide a link, I meant a link that someone past the age of three, would take seriously.

You're awfully cocksure when it comes to the truth aren't you. Did you even bother to read the page?

Stu wrote:

RickD wrote:When I said you're going to need to provide a link, I meant a link that someone past the age of three, would take seriously.

You're awfully cocksure when it comes to the truth aren't you. Did you even bother to read the page?

Dude,

It has nothing to do with being "cocksure" of the truth. Creationwiki isn't a respected website in any circle outside of YEC.

RickD wrote:

Stu wrote:

RickD wrote:When I said you're going to need to provide a link, I meant a link that someone past the age of three, would take seriously.

You're awfully cocksure when it comes to the truth aren't you. Did you even bother to read the page?

Dude,

It has nothing to do with being "cocksure" of the truth. Creationwiki isn't a respected website in any circle outside of YEC.

Like it or not they are surprisingly well read when it came to that article. Many secular sources agree on the part about DNA similarity and possibility (fact) of interbreeding. Then their anatomical structure is pretty close to us though their heads were the most different.

Are you asking about bones being dated from 300 years ago, or bones that show the Neanderthal was 300 years old at the time of death?

Neandertal longevity: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/11/scien ... rthal.html

RickD wrote:Are you asking about bones being dated from 300 years ago, or bones that show the Neanderthal was 300 years old at the time of death?

The latter.