John Allen Chau
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2018 7:46 am
This was in another thread, but I was curious what people here thought, so I'm starting this thread.
My personal opinion is that Mr. Chau was a reckless, selfish, deluded moron who got what was coming to him. He broke a bunch of laws to get somewhere that he wasn't supposed to go, and he went back after the locals attacked him the first time. His behavior was suicidal.
The part that irritates me most is that he seemed not to realize the threat that he represented to the population of Sentinel Island. There are recorded examples of modern people making first contact with uncontacted tribes, and they all seem to end the same way - the majority of the uncontacted people contract diseases for which they have no immunity and they die. It's basically 1492 all over again. If the islanders hadn't killed him he would almost definitely have killed most of them. That, to me at least, seems like something that Mr. Chau should have known. If he didn't then he was reckless, and if he did then he was reckless at best, and a sociopath at worst. Either way, things ended about as well as they could have.
What do others think about this situation?
I'm not seeing how this relates in any way to religious persecution in China. Maybe the kid can be more specific. Moving on...thatkidakayoungguy wrote: ↑Sat Nov 24, 2018 7:48 pm This reminds me of that missionary who was killed by those stone age islanders near India.
https://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-u ... bf074f0fc6
My personal opinion is that Mr. Chau was a reckless, selfish, deluded moron who got what was coming to him. He broke a bunch of laws to get somewhere that he wasn't supposed to go, and he went back after the locals attacked him the first time. His behavior was suicidal.
The part that irritates me most is that he seemed not to realize the threat that he represented to the population of Sentinel Island. There are recorded examples of modern people making first contact with uncontacted tribes, and they all seem to end the same way - the majority of the uncontacted people contract diseases for which they have no immunity and they die. It's basically 1492 all over again. If the islanders hadn't killed him he would almost definitely have killed most of them. That, to me at least, seems like something that Mr. Chau should have known. If he didn't then he was reckless, and if he did then he was reckless at best, and a sociopath at worst. Either way, things ended about as well as they could have.
What do others think about this situation?