Philip wrote: ↑Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:24 pm
DB: Now if my understanding of the timing of the Biblical Adam is correct, then any intermingling between Humans and Neanderthals took place tens of thousands of years before God breathed into the mouth of Adam and Adam became spiritually alive.
Now, I'm tracking with you on the likely timing. Yet, if a creature has human DNA, even intermingled - is it not human?
Other question, when you reference Adam becoming "spiritually alive" - are you asserting that he was already previously existing and then so spiritually imbued? I thought you accepted Adam - while not necessarily the first human (but the first of Christ's line) - that he was however instantly created from dust, and Eve from Adam's rib - in which neither of them existed before they were instantly created in God's image (and not previously existing hominids or evolved creatures)?
Genesis 2:7 lists two steps...
1. The Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground.
2. Then the Lord breathed into his mouth the breath of life.
... it is only after the man had received the breath of life that the man became a 'living soul'.
The implication being that the man was not a 'living soul' prior to receiving the breath of life.
And of course there is the well known linguistic relationship in both the OT and NT between 'breath' and the 'Spirit'.
Now it is interesting to see how Paul deals with this principle of being formed from dust in 1 Cor 15:44-49
44 it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body. 45 So also it is written, “The first man, Adam, became a living soul.” The last Adam became a life-giving spirit. 46 However, the spiritual is not first, but the natural; then the spiritual. 47 The first man is from the earth, earthy; the second man is from heaven. 48 As is the earthy, so also are those who are earthy; and as is the heavenly, so also are those who are heavenly. 49 Just as we have borne the image of the earthy, we will also bear the image of the heavenly.
Paul makes a couple of points that are interesting to me...
in verse 44 Paul says that Adam "became" a living soul. Again pointing out that he was not always a living soul.
The other interesting point is that Paul seems to be telling us that we are 'earthy' in the same way that Adam was 'earthy'. And Paul is defining the mortal body that is 'sown a natural body' as the the 'earthy' body that we all share with Adam.
Which brings us to Psalm 103:14
In this verse David uses the same vocabulary that Moses uses in Genesis 2:7 (ie 'formed' 'dust') to make the point that all men are formed from dust.
So if Paul tells us that we are all earthy just like Adam was earthy, and David tells us that we are all formed from dust, then it
could be possible (I am not positive or dogmatic on this) that Moses' use of the phrase "formed from dust" was a reference to the mortality of Adam's earthy body. Which would explain why God placed the Tree of Life in the Garden of Eden as an antidote to Adam's natural/earthy/mortal status.
Now, none of this is original to me. I was introduced to this principle in John Walton's book, The Lost World of Adam and Eve. I'm still working through what Moses, David, and Paul might have thought "being formed from dust" meant.
I am totally ok with interpreting Genesis 2:7 as a specific creation account for the historical Biblical Adam.
However, I am also open to John Walton's interpretation that Moses is using the phrase "formed from dust" similarly to how David and Paul use it to describe the inherent mortality of all of mankind... including Adam.
Pot stirred