Evidence for God from Science

Yep - we'll always have climate change. And we DO need to clean up our systems' output and pollutants. But IS the data used to drive the global warming / sky is falling / globalists' carbon-tax solutions, etc. rhetoric perhaps immensely problematic? I'd say so!

READ! And tell me what you think?

Article Outtake: "This report, by meteorologist Anthony Watts, presents the results of the first-ever comprehensive review of the quality of data coming from the National Weather Service’s network of temperature stations. Watts and a team of volunteers visually inspected and took pictures of more than 850 of these stations. What they found will shock you."

https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress ... ring09.pdf

https://www.commentarymagazine.com/poli ... locations/

Regardless of the data,because the study was funded by an "anti-climate change" organization, people will simply dismiss the data.

Data that is accurately gathered doesn't lie. While it can be used dishonestly, the study clearly indicates a problem with the systems in place to record local temperature records - particularly their placements, proximities, and construction. Another inconvenient fact, I suppose. Facts will never deter those determined to believe whatever their pre-conceived notions are driving.